NO RETRACTIONS

Lots of liberal bloggers made hay of Bush 41's apparent criticism of his own son's Iraq policy during a recent speech at Tufts University. That story has been shown to be full of holes and as preposterous as it sounds. Yet none of the liberals who promoted the skewed story have retracted or updated their posts about it.

Why?

I have to say, it's that kind of dishonesty on the part of the anti-Bush and therefore anti-war left that keeps me in the game on Bush's team. To be honest I'm not entirely happy with where Bush 43 has taken us to date (he hasn't taken us nearly far enough, in my view), but when his opposition is so obviously bent on twisting all events and the actions of all players on the world stage in such a way as to make Bush look bad and wrong in every case, I can't countenance the substance of their arguments. They wreck their own credibility every single chance they get, and never backtrack when exposed.

UPDATE: CalPundit (a liberal) never bought the Bush-vs-Bush line.
UPDATE AGAIN: I guess more than just libs got suckered in by the Bush-vs-Bush bit. Bill, think before you link.