Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 7719 sources banned.

STUPIDEST. CONGRESSCRITTER. EVER.

Yes, even worse than Cynthia McKinney, scorn be upon her. Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Taliban...I mean Toledo) says that al Qaeda's terrorists are similar to America's founding fathers. How do these people walk and chew gum at the same time, let alone run for (and win!) elective office in the United States of America? It boggles the mind.

Anyway, to the idiocy. In an interview (yes, an interview, where one is supposed to think before speaking), Kaptur said that we Americans should consider our own religious roots before condemning Osama bin Laden & Co. Comparing them to the Green Mountain Boys, a volunteer patriot militia that kicked some redcoat butt, she said

"One could say that Osama bin Laden and these non-nation-state fighters with religious purpose are very similar to those kind of atypical revolutionaries that helped to cast off the British crown."


Where to start? Atypical revolutionaries? Non-nation state fighters? The Green Mountain Boys were fighting to establish a friggin' nation state, and they fought against the army of a more powerful nation state. No intentional civilian-killing, no calls for jamboree jihad--just a little guerilla grunting against King George's well-dressed boys. Apples and oranges, here. And this bit about "casting off" the British crown. She refers to casting off the crown a couple of times in the story, oblivious of the obvious fact that al Qaeda isn't "casting off" anything--they just like to kill people. It's how they get their jollies. The American revolutionaries were indeed casting off a monarchy--the terrorists we fight today just cast off malodorous fumes. Hopefully the people of Ohio will see fit to cast off Rep. Kaptur, but I digress.

She's not done here, folks. Not content to smear the men who fought for George Washington and established this great nation, she then sets off to smear religious folk. Which is a little disconcerting, considering that she seems to be a Catholic. It seems to go with the territory though lately. Here she goes:

"I think that one thing that people of faith understand about the world of Islam is that the kind of insurgency we see occurring in many of these countries is an act of hope that life will be better using Islam as the only reed that they have to lean on.

"I think that people of faith understand that for many of the terrorists, their actions are acts of sacred piety to the point of losing their lives. And I think that people of faith understand that there is a heavy religious overtone to the opposition."


An act of hope? Well-financed mass murder is an act of hope? That's a new one. Ho. Ly. Crap. That's exactly what she's spouting--holy crap. People of any true faith don't do what the Islamists are doing. Christian, Jew, Muslim, Zoroastrian, Rastafarian--if you practice a real faith with any redeeming value at all, that faith doesn't prompt you to crash airplanes full of people into buildings full of people. There's nothing sacred about that--it's just mass murder dressed up as politics. If Kaptur can't see that, well, see the headline to this post.

What a pile of grade-A pup poop. To coin a phrase, go read the whole thing. Then shower.
Post to del.icio.us

Posted by B. Preston on March 5, 2003 10:43 PM
Trackbacks: View (0)Ping
Comments

If she was talking strictly about Usama’s time fighting against the Soviets she might have a point. Many Americans would even agree with her and I still believe that helping the Afghanis during that time was the right thing to do.

But who was this crown he was attempting to overthrow when he murderered 3,000 American on September 11, 2001? The only oppressor in Afghanistan then was . . . oh yeah, Usama’s Taliban “government”. Is she saying that he wanted to overthrow himself? Well, I guess he might have. If so, it worked.

She’s not talking about the Soviets, and has no point. She’s just an idiot.

Posted by Bryan on March 6, 2003 10:07 AM

I particularly was intrigued by this quote from the article, “Even if we take the ground, we do not share the culture and in the end we have to learn to coexist in a world with religious states that we may not agree with and find ways to cooperate.” Wow, that has to be one of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard. Yes, I don’t agree with a culture that murders people by the millions. No, I don’t think there is any “common ground”. How does one “coexist” with people that come to our soil and murder our citizens? Up until 9/11, we pretty much left them alone, thanks to Bill Clinton’s lack of moral clarity. During that period of “coexistence”, the other side perpetrated one attack after another against us and our allies.

Oh, that’s right. Whatever evil is perpetrated throughout the world is ALWAYS our fault. I keep forgetting.

Posted by Jim Smyers on March 6, 2003 10:10 AM

The difference is actually simpler. Usama has made it clear, publicly and repeatedly, that his goal is total world conquest for his brand of Islam. Our goal was only to separate our government from England.

Whether we’re talking about species, individuals, families, tribes, or nations, the basis of morality is the same: Defending your own is moral. Attempting to destroy others, when not done as a necessary part of defending your own, is immoral.

Posted by ockham on March 6, 2003 12:57 PM

The far left senses the push for worldwide revolution and they’re punch-drunk. Of course they don’t want to compare the terrorists to Che Guevara, Mao, Marx or Castro though — so they smear the founding fathers.

Posted by Chris R. on March 6, 2003 1:25 PM

What an idiotarian clown. I’m going to have to re-establish residence in Ohio just to be able to vote against her the next time. My sibs will be voting for her opponent for sure—and BTW, they have always thought that Dennis”the menace” Kucinich was a few slices short of a full loaf too…

Posted by dan on March 6, 2003 3:57 PM

Just another reason why we Ohioians in the southern 2/3’s of the state (the conservative portion of Ohio) hold the northern region in slight regard . That region of the state is a nest of kuncklehead donks intent on inflicting misery on the rest of the state.

Rest assured, she wouldn’t last one term in my district if she mouthed off with that kind idiotic blather.

Posted by Charles on March 6, 2003 6:30 PM

The Atriettes are hailing her comments as extremely intelligent… meanwhile Paul Begala has condemned them. Says a lot.

Post a comment