Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 7719 sources banned.

TERRORISTS IN KUWAIT USED D.C. SNIPER'S TECHNIQUE

Sky news is reporting terrorists just attacked the remainder of the 101st Airborne still in Kuwait and wounded ten. The two suspects used the same "grenade in the tent" technique as D.C. sniper John Muhammad used during the last Gulf War in 1991:

The story, according to Berentson and at least two other former members of the 84th [Engineer Company], was that Muhammad threw a thermite grenade into a tent housing 16 of his fellow soldiers [encamped on the Iraq border].

Thermite grenades - made of finely granulated aluminum mixed with a metal oxide, and blasting heat up to 1,200 degrees - are used to destroy equipment during battle. The attack could easily have killed or maimed, but all 16 in the tent, some coughing and choking, escaped unharmed.

Today's terrorists probably used normal frag grenades though. Due to the tight security it looks like it's probably an inside job. Not necessarily another traitorous John Muhammed, but it could be Kuwaiti contractors or local translators they mentioned. Not likely to be the Iraqi army.

UPDATE: Glenn Frazier has more news posted. Additional reports of small arms fire, carnage, and still-smoking tents. This is why we're at war guys. Go get 'em Screaming Eagles.

UPDATE: The Kuwaiti translators were detained and ruled out, but one U.S. soldier is missing and being searched for. He's obviously a de facto suspect until ruled out, but he's not being named as such.

UPDATE:They've now found and detained the U.S. soldier (and one other unnamed individual) and are questioning him. He was "acting weird" the last few days and was guarding the weapons. He is reported by CBS to be a black American Muslim who, after throwing the grenades, was injured and hid in a bunker. This isn't a hunch one wants to be right about, but it shows how we need to see these wartime Muslim grenade-tossing "terrorist-traitors" for what they are. The Pentagon is now alleging this is the work of a "criminal," even though it appears to be politically motivated. John Muhammad never even faced charges for his grenade attack.

UPDATE: At least one leftist protester in San Francisco was publicly supporting any soldiers who would kill their officers. Looks like we now have a poster child for the crime of sedition. Let's see if the FBI identifies the protester and charges him. Ashcroft needs to draw the legal line for these people fast.

UPDATE:New post on Asan Akbar's motivations.
Post to del.icio.us

Posted by Chris Regan on March 22, 2003 6:52 PM
Trackbacks: View (0)Ping
Comments

I’m less concerned about the protestor than the perpetrator. My last day on active duty was almost 40 years ago but if memory serves, the military justice system is capable of dealing with this case. I trust the military can still execute people.

Posted by dnarr on March 22, 2003 10:23 PM

This “soldier” should be given a court martial and if found guilty, taken away and shot. This BS cannot be tolerated in wartime.

Posted by Bill on March 23, 2003 12:44 AM

Beautiful example of how bloggers can get it right, and the journal form gives it a timestamp. Chris made the parallel with John M even before he thought the present perpetrator could be a similar type!

Posted by ockham on March 23, 2003 1:17 AM

5th column.

Some liberal is going to start blabing that this is what happens when you exploit poor minorities by sending them to war.

Of course this idiot volunteered to be a saboteur.

I’m not sure we could convict the protesters who urge troops to shoot their officers on sedition charges — but I sure wouldn’t mind seeing it tried.

As for the scum who did this, execution for murder is the only appropriate penalty.

Posted by Stephen St. Onge on March 23, 2003 6:52 AM

Let these guys out in the open, it lets us know the entire agenda. It won’t help the “anti-war” movement. And it is true many of these people actually cheer American losses. They are traitors, let’s face it.

It’s only a matter of time before
the “protestors” in this country
start doing similar things. I am
starting to think that “peaceniks” aren’t really about peace, but about agenda.

Posted by Frank Ruggles on March 23, 2003 7:17 AM

Give him a moped and let him go join his buddies in Baghdad. We’ll tend to him in a few days.

Posted by arlo on March 23, 2003 9:01 AM

One thing I found interesting on Saturday night was that after the initial report identified the perpetrator as a Muslim, there was silence about his religion until yesterday. Also on Saturday night they reported that two Kuwaiti translators were involved, something I didn’t hear about all day yesterday. One of the CBS military experts noted that in the Vietnam War there were several incidents of soldiers attacking fellow soldiers with grenades. The expert said that it was surprising that it happened in a well motivated all volunteer army. The he acknowledged that in a group of several thousand people there’s likely to be one or two bad apples.

This guy obviously deserves the death penalty once (and if) found guilty. The fact that he is a Muslim convert only adds fuel to the argument that there is something fundamentally wrong with Islam or that we really should treat current events as a war of the West against the East. No matter how many times someone says that ‘Islam is a religion of peace’, the evidence seems to suggest otherwise. Finally, the argument that this soldier was somehow belittled, abused, or coerced into service as a minority is groundless since he is a Seargeant in an Engineering batallion (if I recall correctly) - this is not some buck private enlisted against his will and forced to go to the front lines.

Posted by Gene on March 24, 2003 11:40 AM
Post a comment