I’m sorry, but your generalizations towards the anti-war movement, calling the left nihilistic hemogonists against liberties, shows how little you’ve looked into this issue, and exposes how narrow your views are. I attend a college which has staged anti-war protests, all of which have been peaceful (what a radical concept), and claiming that disagreance with American policies translates into a risk for terror which should be feared and dealt with as you’re eluding to is as far as I’m concerned about as anti-American as you can get. Who here is against liberty? Those speaking, or those trying to silence them? Liberty and democracy come with a heavy burden… tollerance. I applaud your vision of a liberated world, but i doubt you’re ready for it.

The Ithaca catholics are committing no less a crime than treason in time of war. Furthermore, all protesters who go out and stage parades are giving comfort and emotional support to Hussein and will have the blood of countless Marines on their hands - those that will fall because Hussein and his generals are still clinging to the idea that dead Marines will break our resolve. When the fighting starts, the protests end. The only outcome can be victory.

Andrew obviously didn’t comprehend what he was reading. What the Ithaca Catholics are doing isn’t mere disagreement. What the “protestors” with the “Shoot your officers” sign were doing wasn’t mere disagreement.

There is a line beyond which mere disagreement does not cross. These people have crossed it, and if Andrew doesn’t know where the line is, I sincerely hope he finds out before he, too, crosses it.

I’d like to know which college Andrew attends so that I don’t send my kids there. Not only does he fail “reading for comprehension”, but his mastery of the English language and his sentence construction is pitiful. “Disagreance”? How about “diagreement”? “Tollerance”? How about “tolerance”?

As far as his denial about the makeup of the anti-war movement being comprised of socialists, islamists, anti-capitalists, anarchists, etc. I feel that Andrew needs to do a little more reading and research into the roots and funding of this movement. The facts are out there if you choose to look. Those who seek truth do not need to hide behind words like tolerance. If your movement celebrates soldiers who frag their own commanders then you are morally bankrupt and I have no requirement to tolerate you.

I’m almost tempted to repeat the Pogo line, “We have seen the enemy …” The only way we (the US) can lose is by beating ourselves. Saddam is probably squeezing out a chuckle or two (if he is physically able!) when the knuckle-head “peace” protesters use violent tactics. Seems like some of the liberals’ true colors are starting to show.

Treason? I don’t think so. Sedition? Absolutely.

Attending college is a great fig leaf for committing mischief. And as Andrew demonstrates, it’s no guarantee of being literate - which should include the difference between “eluding” and “alluding”.

I think ELC is on the right track.

I know treason is hard to prove, but some people seem to be going over the line and adhering to, or providing aid and comfort to the enemy. Sabotage might be considered waging war. That grenade attack would definitely fall under the waging war against U.S. category — if you look at the motive, planning and tactics the soldier apparently used — cutting the lights first, attacking the command structure, and shooting survivors after the blast.

Then again, even Johnny Taliban didn’t face treason charges. Whatever charges are brought, something needs to be done.

I might settle for “Treason Lite”