Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 7719 sources banned.

STRANGE, PSYCHO, CRAZY CLINTON

After hearing Chris Matthews say this lucid comment on Leno:

I gotta hand it to the generals. Everybody criticized their plan. Their plan was masterful. . . . This war is definitely a good thing for the Iraqis.

I think the feeling in this country is: we were hit hard at home, by people who came here to kill us -- kill thousands of us. And this is about that, this emotion, the sense that something had to be done about it. That's why Bush is so popular. He's a very basic guy. He's not complicated. He's not like some strange, psycho, crazy guy like Clinton, you can't figure out any day of the week. [audience applauds, not a single boo]

Then we get this nutty comment from Bill Clinton:

Our paradigm now seems to be: something terrible happened to us on September 11, and that gives us the right to interpret all future events in a way that everyone else in the world must agree with us, and if they don't, they can go straight to hell. . . .

We can't run, if you got an interdependent world, and you cannot kill, jail or occupy all your adversaries, sooner or later you have to make a deal.

A deal?? He clearly means appeasement to go with his post-9/11 moral relativism. We can infer this from his comments because he dismisses Bush's successful diplomatic deals to pull this war off with the "first" unanimous UN resolution, and to bring Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Yemen into line against terror for now. Bush has tried to do the same, using just the stick, with Iran, Libya, Syria and North Korea to the extent possible with pure terror states. We're accepting whatever good-faith cooperation they give us in an effort to allow them a chance before we put them on any military hit list. North Korea and Iran have shown some positive signs lately, but Syria may have chosen to follow the path of Iraq and Afghanistan. That path leads strait to hell for their regime, as Clinton put it. That's their choice, not ours, and it results in their people being free from tyranny, while the world becomes more free from terror. Don't forget, we bent over backwards for all these rogue nations for an entire decade at least, but that's not good enough for Bill Clinton. He will only be satisfied with pure appeasement.

After his recent dangerous comments on North Korea, and now this stuff, Hillary may need to help us all out by having her reckless man involuntarily committed for the protection of America. Remember, some Democrats are still hoping to repeal the 22nd amendment so he can run for President again. That can't make Hillary too happy.

UPDATE: Newt Gingrich says Clinton is acting out of "victory envy." Hehehe.
Post to del.icio.us

Posted by Chris Regan on April 16, 2003 5:00 AM
Trackbacks: View (0)Ping
Comments

Who cares if Hillary is unhappy; what’s important is to make sure she’s never anyplace further than she’s gotten to right now; maybe even make sure she loses that spot as soon as possible!

”..you cannot kill, jail or occupy all your adversaries, sooner or later you have to make a deal.”

I’m genuinely disappointed. I’d expect this from Idiot Jimmah, but I really thought Clinton was smarter than this. The whole purpose of killing, jailing, and occupying SOME of your adversaries is exactly so you can make a stronger and more advantageous deal, sooner or later, with the surviving adversaries.

Clinton followed this principle vigorously in his own political career. He should understand it in larger terms as well.

Posted by ockham on April 16, 2003 1:05 PM

He does, Ock — it’s just not in the best interest of his Legacy Rehabilitation ProjectTM to say so right this minute.

Clinton’s foreign policy was to somehow have everyone love him, so he could set himself up for a Nobel prize. History may have another prize for him, though, as the great procrastinator/cover-upper. One of the main functions of President is to be the chief US diplomat/representative, with the Sec. of State breaking ground. We are seeing the fruits (and having to clean up the messes) of the “mighty” Clinton/Albright team.

with all the realizations now of the clinton messes, it is time to remember who actually gave us this great gift (ha ha). none other than mr ross perot. whose presidential run split the oposition and gave the presidency to mr clinton.

Posted by tomj on April 17, 2003 12:44 AM
Post a comment