Brian, it’s unrelated, but I’d like to know what you think about this editorial I found at The Army Times.

I can’t get the link to work. What’s it about?

well, hell, now it’s gone.
I did save a bit of it though~
“In recent months, President Bush and the Republican-controlled Congress have missed no opportunity to heap richly deserved praise on the military.

But talk is cheap — and getting cheaper by the day, judging from the nickel-and-dime treatment the troops are getting lately.
the White House griped that various pay-and-benefits incentives added to the 2004 defense budget by Congress are wasteful and unnecessary — including a modest proposal to double the $6,000 gratuity paid to families of troops who die on active duty.
This comes at a time when Americans continue to die in Iraq at a rate of about one a day.

Similarly, the administration announced that on Oct. 1 it wants to roll back recent modest increases in monthly imminent-danger pay (from $225 to $150) and family-separation allowance (from $250 to $100) for troops getting shot at in combat zones.”
there was alot more, but nothing at all about the cut in veteran’s benefits.
It just seems odd to me that Bush would do this to the Armed Forces at a time when they are so important to the US and the world.