THE GLOBALIST SCOTUS SCOTSLOTUS IS BLOOMING

This was a bizarre interview to watch after the recent Supreme Court rulings:

In a rare appearance on a television news show, Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer questioned whether the U.S. Constitution, the oldest governing document in use in the world today, will continue to be relevant in an age of globalism. . . .

"We see all the time, Justice O'Connor and I, and the others, how the world really -- it's trite but it's true -- is growing together," Breyer said. "Through commerce, through globalization, through the spread of democratic institutions, through immigration to America, it's becoming more and more one world of many different kinds of people. And how they're going to live together across the world will be the challenge, and whether our Constitution and how it fits into the governing documents of other nations, I think will be a challenge for the next generations."

...O'Connor, too, seemed to suggest in the ABC interview that the Constitution was far from the final word in governing America. Asked if there might come a day when it would no longer be the last word on the law, she said: "Well, you always have the power of entering into treaties with other nations which also become part of the law of the land, but I can't see the day when we won't have a constitution in our nation."

So the living Constitution will still be alive, just "all grown up" and married into elitist global liberalism. More here on how the U.N. helped our justices find the new international right to sodomy in our Constitution.

In the majority opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy referred to a "Friend of the Court" brief submitted by former United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson.

"Other nations with similar histories, legal systems, and political cultures have already answered these questions in the affirmative. This Court should pay due respect to these opinions of humankind."

Robinson warned also that, "To ignore these precedents virtually ensures that this Court's ruling will generate controversies with the United State's closest global allies."

So what's going on here? Just when we might soon get our Scottish Law impeachment "expert" Arlen Specter (remember when appealing to the laws of other countries was a national joke?) as a new member on the Court, we may be seeing the dawn of a new Supreme Court of the Scottish Law of the U.S. More details here on the blooming of the SCOTSLOTUS.

Here's a bit about Mary Robinson too:

As the forum moved into its third day, it became clear in successive sessions that each speaker had a new angle on the same idea: The UN should coordinate global governance. Some speakers focused on environmental governance, others on educational efforts aimed at producing citizens committed to global peace and justice.

Disconcerting as the economic, "rights," and sovereignty proposals were, still greater alarm is raised from the spiritual ambitions of the globalists at the State of the World Forum. Popular sessions on the "physics of consciousness" set the tone. A midweek session, "Cosmology, Globalization and the Evolution of Human Consciousness," studded with New Age luminaries Deepak Chopra and Jean Houston [Hillary Clinton's favorite] , drew large crowds. "Religions as Major Stakeholders" featured Shaunaka Rishi, Oxford University's director of New Vedic Studies; Sam Kobia, of the World Council of Churches; and Rajwant Singh, director of Sikh social action. The glaring omission of mainstream Christianity conveyed more than the participation of minority sects. . . .

Global governance seeks stable world conditions so as to ensure the rights of humanity to clean air, stable markets, and personal rights, including "gender equity" and "reproductive rights."

Naturally, some mechanism of enforcement is required if the rights of all are to be protected, added forum participants. Mary Robinson, UN high commissioner for human rights, told a BBC broadcast that the "focus is on human security. The border of national sovereignty isn't a cutoff. We must mainstream human rights."

Roundtable discussions, entitled "Evolution and the Future of Global Governance," "Globalization and Global Governance," and "Global Commons," were moderated by members of the European Parliament, former U.S. Senator Alan Cranston, national education ministers, and even heads of state, such as Joaquim Albert, president of Mozambique, and Helen Clark, prime minister of New Zealand.

Mary Robinson has also written several articles for Share International, Benjamin Creme's UN NGO that is paving the way for the reappearance of his "ascended master" New Age "global teacher" Lord Maitraya. I coincidentally linked him on a whim in a previous post, and am not making this stuff up. He's the current projected leader of the One World Religion crowd. Creme also foresees global government coming under "Christ" Maitreya's direction. Oh boy, that would be real fun.

These UN globalists that are now apparently determining our Supreme Court decisions are all pretty far out there spiritually -- and united against conservative Christians. You can see that the issue of faith and religion as a moral foundation for law is never going away. It's simply a matter of who's morality will prevail at what level of government. Though the language may sound similar, UN-style human rights are different from the American Constitution's or the classic Judeo-Christian concept. Our suddenly postmodern Supreme Court has come down firmly on the side of UN New Age global consensus as the moral and legal authority for America. America's Constitutional conservatives and Christians in each of the 50 states (Sullivan's supposedly dangerous "theocrats") have been dialogued completely out of the process in favor of New Age "globo-theocrats" who don't have a Constitution to worry about limiting their power.

Mary Robinson has also stated that the U.S. is trailing other countries when it comes to "hate speech" laws, so there are more changes to come -- and more in store for Christians who might insist on speaking out when abortion is enshrined after sodomy as an international human right. Just wait until the Robinson's UN definition of children's rights are enforced in US courts.

. . .

Extra credit for the reader who can tell me what process or technique the Court's current globo-justices have followed in taking this case...using a conflict over diversity...to facilitate a pseudo-legal "dialogue to consensus"...regarding a social issue...in order to bypass legislation...and reach an (extra-Constitutional) predetermined outcome for America.