Clark isn’t really all that smart. He was a career bumbler as an Officer and he’s carrying his bumbling ways into his political career. The man gets anything he gets because of connections, not because he’s done anything to deserve it.

Bush isn’t really all that smart. He was a career bumbler as a deserter and he’s carrying his bumbling ways into his political career. The man gets anything he gets because of connections, not because he’s done anything to deserve it.

You left out how he now says he never would have hired Rumsfeld, when two years ago he said this country needed him there.

old boy obviously isn’t accustomed to having to answer questions from the peanut gallery that they haven’t been briefed to ask.

Oh, and Webster, you don’t fly F102s and survive to tell about it if you’re a bumbler. Projecting, perhaps?

Hey Webster, whaddya say to this:

“US President George Bush is ‘totally at odds’ with his media image, Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Menzies Campbell said today. Mr. Campbell, an opponent of the war with Iraq, spoke out on the ePolitix website about his discussions with the President during the state visit. He said that they discussed directly issues such as Iraq, the Middle East, Guantanamo Bay, Kyoto and trade sanctions. ‘He is personally extremely engaging. He has a well-developed sense of humour, is self-deprecating and when he engages in a discussion with you he is warm and concentrates directly on you. He looks you straight in the eye and tells you exactly what he thinks.’”

That’s from a liberal British MP who met Bush during this week’s trip. I’ve met Bush—he’s a smart guy. But don’t take it from a conservative if you don’t want to—take it from a fellow lib if it makes it go down easier.

Oh, and Webster, you don’t fly F102s and survive to tell about it if you’re a bumbler. Projecting, perhaps?

I’m obviously too liberal to know what this means. Would this happen to refer to the Bush’s daring carrier landing? I’m all welled up.

Mr. Campbell, an opponent of the war with Iraq, spoke out on the ePolitix website about his discussions with the President during the state visit.

Bryan, you describe this guy as a liberal British MP. So what? One guy says this, when you have a whole slew of idiocies coming from Bush stateside (and overseas – don’t suppose you caught his interview, or how about his impressive statesmanship in front of the Queen?), and so much so that he doesn’t have regular press conferences, and when he does make speeches, it’s only in front of friendly, safe crowds. Some vigorous mind you have there.

Yea, Clark would be a disaster compared to Bush.

Tell me – who do you think is more bumbling, Bush or Clark?

Really, now.

Webster,

The F-102 comments is in reference to the fact that Bush used to fly them as a fighter pilot in the Air National Guard. Flying a fighter jet is certainly no job for a fool.

While Bush is certainly not the greatest orator of our day, I hope you agree that just because he is “vernacularly challenged” doesn’t mean he is a fool.

Would you ever claim that the opposite is true: that, for instance, Farrakhan was your intellectual superior simply because he could annunciate you into pretzel knots? I doubt it.

Let’s call Bush what he really is, a poor orator, and not a dummy.

Webster, F102’s are fighter airplanes. Pres. Bush was qualified as a pilot of this aircraft during his National Guard service. Flying an F102 requires great dexterity and the ability to make split-second decisions of a life-and-death nature. This is exponentially above the primitive knee-jerk responses your liberal brain can handle, so it’s not surprising you don’t understand.

Dismissing Pres. Bush’s well-reasoned speeches because you don’t care for his delivery certainly shows the vigor of your mind. I suppose you don’t think much of Stephen Hawking, either; that mechanical voice is just so droll. They must both be idiots.

So, to answer your question - Clark is more bumbling, of course. Really. And now. Just ask those who served with him. Oh, I forgot - personal experience means nothing to you, since you ignored Bryan’s personal observation that Pres. Bush is indeed “a smart guy”.

Clark’s latest flip-flop on Rumsfeld is another classic example of his Clintonesque training:

Check it out here.

Joe Lemyre:

You must change your shorts constantly watching the history channel.

Anyway:

seems…

F102’s are fighter airplanes. Pres. Bush was qualified as a pilot of this aircraft during his National Guard service. Flying an F102 requires great dexterity and the ability to make split-second decisions of a life-and-death nature…yadda, yadda, yadda, insult the liberal thing.

Bush deserted. Clark stays in. Your point?

Clark? Okay. A few people don’t like him. Maybe more than that. But your Champion George W.? He’s a deserter. Tell me otherwise (and I suppose you’d have the balls to say otherwise, well…) And he’s supposed to be somehow better than any, and I mean ANY, of the democratic candidates running for office.

Does George hate America since he couldn’t find his way to Vietnam?

You wouldn’t happen to be paid to be asserting othewise, would you?

My point, Webster, was that you don’t know what you’re talking about. Thank you for proving it so convincingly.