SO...

Gen. Wes Clark believes Bill Clinton, not George W. Bush, deserves credit for Libya's decision to disarm.

We're three years into the Bush presidency, and nine months into the Iraq war/aftermath, and Libya just happens to have disarmed after nine months of negotiations with the US and Britain, but the Bush administration doesn't deserve any credit in Clark's eyes?

But...in the same breath, Clark blames Bush for 9-11, which occurred less than a year into his presidency. And no mention of the "Bush recession," which began before Bush even took office.

The pattern seems to go like this: Anything good that happens, at any time, is the result of Democrat virtue, even if no Democrat is anywhere near power at the time (and Democrats are nowhere near power right now). But anything bad that happens, well, that has to be the result of Republican incompetence or wickedness, just because.

Whatever. But if Dems will be dishonest about something as bloody obvious as the reason Libya disarmed (Gaddafi said he saw what was going on in Iraq, and it scared him), what else will they lie to you about?