Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 7719 sources banned.

DON'T THEY KNOW THERE'S AN ELECTION ON?

John F. Kerry is running around the country saying lots of things, raising lots of money, cussing out his Secret Service detail and falling on ski slopes. He's saying things about some guy who lives in a big white house in Washington. That guy, whose name is George W. Bush, apparently runs something big called the "government," and this Kerry fellow thinks Bush is doing it all wrong so he's out there trying to get enough people to put him in that white house instead of Bush. Apparently whoever lives in that house gets to run the "government."

This whole thing--Mr. Kerry saying things about Mr. Bush, and Mr. Bush saying things about Mr. Kerry, both raising gobs of money so they can make commercials and print stuff and generate all sorts of media noise--is called an "election." It's a feature of "democracy," a system whereby government officials stand before the voters every few years and either ask to keep the job they have or ask to be given the job some other guy has. Currently Bush has the job that Kerry wants. The coming "election" will determine who gets the house and the job for the next few years.

I suspect you probably already knew all this. Someone needs to explain it to Democrats.com.

You see, they're out pushing a whole bunch of angry books. They want people to read them, and then demand that Congress--that's another part of the "government"--impeach President Bush.

They're apparently unaware that they have the means to remove Mr. Bush from that house in Washington just by getting enough people to agree with them that he shouldn't keep it. They're apparently under the mistaken impression that the only way to get Bush out of that house, which goes with the job of running the "government," is to impeach him. Put him on trial, convict him and run him out of town. Possibly jail him. The tone of the email I received from them this morning suggested they're quite angry with Mr. Bush, and jail may be too good for him.

You'd think people who call themselves "Democrats" would understand "democracy" and this feature known as "elections." But apparently they don't. They don't know there's an election on. Or they've given up any hope of actually winning it fairly.

Post to del.icio.us

Posted by B. Preston on March 22, 2004 11:10 AM
Trackbacks: View (0)Ping
Comments

I think the calls for the impeachment of Bush are ludicrous; but you’ve got to admit that impeachment is part of the “democratic” process as well. Elections for office are one part; recall petitions are another part; and impeachment proceedings are yet another part — and they’re all legitimate in our political system.

But with an election just a few months away, what’s the point? There is absolutely no way of generating support for impeachment between now and November, and there’s not even a need.

So don’t give me that crap about it being “legitimate” and focus on what they’re actually up to. Impeachment based on trumped up charges is not legitimate, and those books they’re pushing are full of nonsensical accusations. And why even bother with impeachment when there’s an opportunity to get Bush out via less divisive and injurious means in just a few months?

They’re your political allies. Maybe you can make some sense of this gambit.

Posted by Bryan on March 22, 2004 12:06 PM

Bryan - Like I said, I think it’s ludicrous. And I can’t make any sense of this, because I think it is senseless. But people have the right to pursue this effort if they want to, as long as they play by the rules and do so peacefully. I also thought the same of the recall election in California when no sooner had the polls closed and Davis was re-elected than the recall effort began. What does that say about respecting “elections” as a measure of legitimacy? But, the recallers had the right to do as they did under California law and their “gambit” worked. I might not have liked it, but I can’t complain about its legitimacy.

Maybe they think elections are a bug, not a feature

Posted by Pat Dean on March 22, 2004 6:38 PM
Post a comment