Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 7719 sources banned.

"WHY I RESIGNED FROM THE CIA"

George Tenet and other high-ranking officials who elevated Michael Scheuer's profile when his book, Imperial Hubris, was misread as an attack on the Bush administration's anti-terror policies are going to regret it:

I do not profess a broad expertise in international affairs, but between January 1996 and June 1999 I was in charge of running operations against Al Qaeda from Washington. When it comes to this small slice of the large U.S. national security pie, I speak with firsthand experience (and for several score of CIA officers) when I state categorically that during this time senior White House officials repeatedly refused to act on sound intelligence that provided multiple chances to eliminate Osama bin Laden — either by capture or by U.S. military attack. I witnessed and documented, along with dozens of other CIA officers, instances where life-risking intelligence-gathering work of the agency's men and women in the field was wasted.

Because of classification issues, I argued this point only obliquely in my book "Imperial Hubris," but it is a fact — and fortunately, no American has to depend on my word alone. The 9/11 commission report documents most of the occasions on which senior U.S. bureaucrats and policymakers had the chance to attack Bin Laden in 1998-1999. It is mystifying that the American public has not been outraged over these missed opportunities.

After smashing Richard "I'm sorry for all of Bush's screw-ups" Clarke, Scheuer zeroes in on several relevant questions and individuals:

Perhaps a starting point is for Americans to ask why no member of Congress' Graham-Goss investigation or the Kean-Hamilton commissioners ever directly asked Clarke, former national security advisor Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, CIA Director George J. Tenet, former FBI Director Louis J. Freeh, former Secretary of State William S. Cohen or any of the rest of the witnesses why they never erred on the side of protecting Americans; why international opinion was ultimately more important than the Americans who leaped from the World Trade Center; and why the intelligence was "good enough" to save the life of an Arab prince dining with bin Laden, but not "good enough" to cause the government to act on behalf of Americans.

Read the whole thing.

Post to del.icio.us

Posted by B. Preston on December 6, 2004 10:17 AM
Trackbacks: View (0)Ping
Comments

And we should believe Scheurer because…?

Seriously, this is the guy who failed. His judgement is suspect; instead of telling us what we’re doing wrong now, he should be facing the music for what he screwed up then.

Crawford,

I thought that it was the CIA that offered up actionable intel to the President, who was responsible for the go/no go orders. If CIA offered it up, they did their job. If Clinton kicked the can down the street, explain to me how that is Schuer’s fault. Have another glass of koolaid, Mr. Crawford.

Posted by Jimbo on December 6, 2004 4:46 PM

I’m not excusing Clinton; I just don’t think Scheurer has any credibility. He failed; let’s stop treating him like an expert, and start treating him like a failure.

Mr. Crawford is right. Obviously Scheurer no longer has any credibility, as he did during the election, because he is no longer useful as a source of anti-Bush propaganda.

Post a comment