LEFT BEHIND
The WaPo half-heartedly wades into the local government's responsibility to help its least advantaged citizens escape the wrath of a terrible hurricane. I say half-heartedly, because the Post manages to sidestep those big yellow monuments to local incompetence:
In the months before the storm, the city's emergency planners did debate the challenges posed by these numbers, which are much higher than in other hurricane-prone parts of the country, such as Florida. Because a rapid organization of so many buses would have been impractical, the city's emergency managers considered the use of trains and cruise ships. The New Orleans charity Operation Brother's Keeper had tried to get church congregations to match up car-owners with the carless, and it had produced a DVD on the subject of hurricane evacuations that was to be distributed later this month. Unfortunately, none of these plans was advanced enough to have had much impact this week.
If the "plan wasn't advanced enough," whose fault is that? It's not as though no one knew that New Orleans was a city living on borrowed time. And how hard is it to give people a map of pickup points--mail them out, put them in newspapers, have a website, etc--and have a system of cascading phone calls to get drivers alerted? Where are you going to get the drivers? Well, since they're school buses, how about using the school's drivers? Make it part of their job to be ready to drive people to safety in the event of a disaster. They'd probably volunteer for all sorts of reasons, not least of which is that by driving others to safety, they're also driving themselves to safety.
This kind of planning is not hard. It's a no-brainer.
This Post editorial is a base coverer. They can say that they covered the bus-ted story without really covering it. They can say that they asked a few questions without really asking any of the hard questions of the local "leaders" whose responsibility included making sure the whole city could get out when the mandatory evacuation order came down. The Post can say that its reportage addresses all the angles, even though it doesn't address them with the necessary attention to detail.
Not buying it.
(thanks to Chris)
YOU'LL GET BETTER COVERAGE FROM BLOGGERS THAN THE MSM UPDATE: Punditguy's take is right:
The anger burning in New Orleans over the past few days is justifiable. Refugees deserve an explanation.But, their anger should not be directed at George W. Bush. Their anger should be directed at the criminals in their city, the drug addicts who held up their neighbors at gunpoint, the looters who stole from their neighborhood businesses, and the bad decisions, the bad calls, the inaction, and the ineffectiveness of their disconnected and dysfunctional local government.
That's how I see it.











