Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 7719 sources banned.

That Zogby Poll of the Troops in Iraq

National Review’s John Derbyshire uses it as a springboard to justify his curmudgeonry, though it’s a hopelessly flawed poll.

It was comissioned by an anti-war group, and conducted by the pollster who insisted the 2004 election was John Kerry’s to lose. Zogby also insisted that Kerry would win 311 electoral votes (he actually got 252 and did not win the election). Right up until the closing of the polls, Zogby continued to insist that Kerry would win. Was that based on any actual poll result or just wishful thinking?

The questions Zogby used in the poll were leading and therefore guaranteed to skew the result. It’s also worth noting that John Zogby and his brother James Zogby have long-standing associations with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a group that has known connections to Islamism. It would be painting with a very broad brush to assume that CAIR’s connections to terrorists are Zobgy’s, but it wouldn’t be out of bounds to wonder whether being one step removed from association with Hamas might color Zogby’s opinions of the war and therefore his work on public opinion polling.

I don’t find him or his polls trustworthy at all.

But on a more basic level, what on earth was the Pentagon thinking when it allowed this poll to be conducted, especially given who paid for it and who conducted it? It should have been obvious from the outset that this poll was going to become yet another anti-war talking point. The anti-war movement’s holy grail is to turn the troops against the war they’re fighting and use that to kill off the war’s remaining public support; a poll that purports to prove that the troops are against the war gets the anti-war movement very far toward that goal.

SecDef Rumsfeld recently noted that we’re fighting an information war against the terrorists, and we’re losing it. No wonder. If the Pentagon continues making boneheaded decisions like the one that put untrustworthy James Zogby and his anti-war patrons in charge of gathering up the troops’ opinions on the war, we have no hope of winning it.

(thanks to Chris)

Post to del.icio.us

Posted by B. Preston on March 3, 2006 10:07 AM
Trackbacks: View (0)Ping
Comments

Zogby earned his fame for being the only pollster to predicted the 1994 GOP sweep of Congress. Like any pollsters he’s right and wrong. Who sponsored the poll isn’t as important as the questions. If the questions are leading (I’m trusting you on this; I haven’t read them) then the association with his brother and CAIR would explain that. However, claiming that working for an anti-war group causes the poll to be misleading isn’t logically sound. All that concerns me is are the poll questions good and is it a good sample.

Data on how many soldiers refused to answer any questions at all would be relevant too.

Recently I had become disafffected by Hugh Hewitt for his political-hack, party-line stances (my perception), but I have to give him credit on this one; he fried old Zogby’s a** with a number of penetrating questions resulting in a “hang up” from the pollster..

..if you can’t stand the heat, John, move to Minnesota?

Posted by k6whp on March 3, 2006 5:30 PM
Post a comment